Review



mouse anti-adp-ribosylation factor 6 arf6 clone: 3a-1  (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)


Bioz Verified Symbol Santa Cruz Biotechnology is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 90

    Structured Review

    Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse anti-adp-ribosylation factor 6 arf6 clone: 3a-1
    Mouse Anti Adp Ribosylation Factor 6 Arf6 Clone: 3a 1, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti-adp-ribosylation factor 6 arf6 clone: 3a-1/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti-adp-ribosylation factor 6 arf6 clone: 3a-1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    90
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse anti-adp-ribosylation factor 6 arf6 clone: 3a-1
    Mouse Anti Adp Ribosylation Factor 6 Arf6 Clone: 3a 1, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti-adp-ribosylation factor 6 arf6 clone: 3a-1/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti-adp-ribosylation factor 6 arf6 clone: 3a-1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse monoclonal primary antibodies for arf6
    Western blot analysis of extracellular vesicle markers. Thirty micrograms of proteins from whole-cell protein extracts (lines C) and ectosome samples (lines E) separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to the PVDF membrane were probed with anti-CD63, anti-Hsp70, and <t>anti-Arf6</t> as primary antibodies and anti-mouse IgG-HRP as a secondary antibody.
    Mouse Monoclonal Primary Antibodies For Arf6, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal primary antibodies for arf6/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse monoclonal primary antibodies for arf6 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti mouse primary antibodies against arf6
    Western blot analysis of extracellular vesicle markers. Thirty micrograms of proteins from whole-cell protein extracts (lines C) and ectosome samples (lines E) separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to the PVDF membrane were probed with anti-CD63, anti-Hsp70, and <t>anti-Arf6</t> as primary antibodies and anti-mouse IgG-HRP as a secondary antibody.
    Anti Mouse Primary Antibodies Against Arf6, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti mouse primary antibodies against arf6/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti mouse primary antibodies against arf6 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse anti arf6 mab
    a , b <t>ARF6</t> activity (ARF6 GTP) assessed by effector pull-down in HaCaT keratinocytes in the presence or absence of 10 µg/ml CAR or m CAR peptide. a Representative blots of ARF6 activity during time-course. ARF6 GTP: ARF6 detection in GST-GGA3 pull-down eluate. Total ARF6: ARF6 expression in total cell lysate. Tubulin: total cell lysate loading control. b Mean ARF6 activity, relative to total ARF6 ± S.E.M. normalised to 0 min Nil treatment. N = 3–7 independent biological replicate experiments (Nil: 0 min N = 7, 60 min N = 3; CAR: 10–60 min N = 3, 120 min N = 7; m CAR: 30–60 min N = 3, 120 min N = 6). Datapoints represent ARF6 activity per experiment. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test: Nil 0’ vs CAR 120’ P = 6.457 × 10 −5 ; CAR 120’ vs m CAR 120’ P = 6.732 × 10 −6 ; Nil 60’ vs CAR 60’ P = 4.865 × 10 −5 ; CAR 60’ vs m CAR 60’ P = 0.0063. Holm-Sidak t test: Nil 0’ vs CAR 10’ P = 0.0004. c – e ARF6 activity in HaCaT cells transfected with control siRNA (CTRL KD), human SDC4-targeting siRNA oligo #1 (SDC4 KD #1) or human SDC4-targeting siRNA oligo #2 (SDC4 KD #2), in the presence or absence of 10 µg/ml CAR or m CAR peptide. c Representative blots of ARF6 activity during time-course. ARF6 GTP: ARF6 detection in GST-GGA3 pull-down eluate; total ARF6: ARF6 expression in total cell lysate. d Mean ARF6 activity, relative to total ARF6 ± S.E.M. normalised to Nil treatment. N = 3–5 independent replicate experiments (Ctrl KD: Nil 0 min N = 5; CAR 10 min N = 4, 30–120 min N = 5; mCAR 120 min N = 3. SDC4 KD #1: Nil 0 min N = 3; CAR 10–120 min N = 3; m CAR 120 min N = 3. SDC4 KD #5: Nil 0 min N = 5; CAR 10–120 min N = 5; m CAR 120 min N = 3). Datapoints represent ARF6 activity per experiment. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test: CTRL KD Nil 0’ vs CAR 120’ P = 0.0299; CTRL KD CAR 120’ vs SDC4 KD #1 CAR 120’ P = 0.0499; CTRL KD CAR 120’ vs SDC4 KD #2 CAR 120’ P = 0.0132. Holm-Sidak t test: CTRL KD Nil 0’ vs CTRL KD CAR 10’ P = 0.0012. Source data are provided in file. e Flow cytometric analysis of cell surface SDC4 in HaCaTs following SDC4 knockdown.
    Mouse Anti Arf6 Mab, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti arf6 mab/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti arf6 mab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse monoclonal anti human arf6 antibody
    ( A ) Schematic illustrating effect of <t>ARF6</t> mutations on GTP hydrolysis and GDP exchange. ( B ) Expression of endogenous and HA-tagged mutant ARF6 (WT, CA, DN and FC) was studied by western blotting in HPAECs 24 hour post-infection. ( C ) Representative western blots and ( D ) a corresponding graph showing changes in the levels of active (GTP-bound) ARF6, total ARF6 and β-actin, as indicated. ( D ) shows fold-changes normalised to the empty adenoviral control (AdC) (n=3 different biological replicates), ***P<0.001; one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test.
    Mouse Monoclonal Anti Human Arf6 Antibody, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal anti human arf6 antibody/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse monoclonal anti human arf6 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse anti arf6
    ( A ) Schematic illustrating effect of <t>ARF6</t> mutations on GTP hydrolysis and GDP exchange. ( B ) Expression of endogenous and HA-tagged mutant ARF6 (WT, CA, DN and FC) was studied by western blotting in HPAECs 24 hour post-infection. ( C ) Representative western blots and ( D ) a corresponding graph showing changes in the levels of active (GTP-bound) ARF6, total ARF6 and β-actin, as indicated. ( D ) shows fold-changes normalised to the empty adenoviral control (AdC) (n=3 different biological replicates), ***P<0.001; one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test.
    Mouse Anti Arf6, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti arf6/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti arf6 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Western blot analysis of extracellular vesicle markers. Thirty micrograms of proteins from whole-cell protein extracts (lines C) and ectosome samples (lines E) separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to the PVDF membrane were probed with anti-CD63, anti-Hsp70, and anti-Arf6 as primary antibodies and anti-mouse IgG-HRP as a secondary antibody.

    Journal: Cells

    Article Title: The Proangiogenic Effects of Melanoma-Derived Ectosomes Are Mediated by αvβ5 Integrin Rather than αvβ3 Integrin

    doi: 10.3390/cells13161336

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Western blot analysis of extracellular vesicle markers. Thirty micrograms of proteins from whole-cell protein extracts (lines C) and ectosome samples (lines E) separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to the PVDF membrane were probed with anti-CD63, anti-Hsp70, and anti-Arf6 as primary antibodies and anti-mouse IgG-HRP as a secondary antibody.

    Article Snippet: Mouse monoclonal primary antibodies for Arf6 (clone 3A-1, cat. sc-7971) and Hsp70 (clone C92F3A-5, cat. sc-66048) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX, USA).

    Techniques: Western Blot, SDS Page, Membrane

    a , b ARF6 activity (ARF6 GTP) assessed by effector pull-down in HaCaT keratinocytes in the presence or absence of 10 µg/ml CAR or m CAR peptide. a Representative blots of ARF6 activity during time-course. ARF6 GTP: ARF6 detection in GST-GGA3 pull-down eluate. Total ARF6: ARF6 expression in total cell lysate. Tubulin: total cell lysate loading control. b Mean ARF6 activity, relative to total ARF6 ± S.E.M. normalised to 0 min Nil treatment. N = 3–7 independent biological replicate experiments (Nil: 0 min N = 7, 60 min N = 3; CAR: 10–60 min N = 3, 120 min N = 7; m CAR: 30–60 min N = 3, 120 min N = 6). Datapoints represent ARF6 activity per experiment. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test: Nil 0’ vs CAR 120’ P = 6.457 × 10 −5 ; CAR 120’ vs m CAR 120’ P = 6.732 × 10 −6 ; Nil 60’ vs CAR 60’ P = 4.865 × 10 −5 ; CAR 60’ vs m CAR 60’ P = 0.0063. Holm-Sidak t test: Nil 0’ vs CAR 10’ P = 0.0004. c – e ARF6 activity in HaCaT cells transfected with control siRNA (CTRL KD), human SDC4-targeting siRNA oligo #1 (SDC4 KD #1) or human SDC4-targeting siRNA oligo #2 (SDC4 KD #2), in the presence or absence of 10 µg/ml CAR or m CAR peptide. c Representative blots of ARF6 activity during time-course. ARF6 GTP: ARF6 detection in GST-GGA3 pull-down eluate; total ARF6: ARF6 expression in total cell lysate. d Mean ARF6 activity, relative to total ARF6 ± S.E.M. normalised to Nil treatment. N = 3–5 independent replicate experiments (Ctrl KD: Nil 0 min N = 5; CAR 10 min N = 4, 30–120 min N = 5; mCAR 120 min N = 3. SDC4 KD #1: Nil 0 min N = 3; CAR 10–120 min N = 3; m CAR 120 min N = 3. SDC4 KD #5: Nil 0 min N = 5; CAR 10–120 min N = 5; m CAR 120 min N = 3). Datapoints represent ARF6 activity per experiment. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test: CTRL KD Nil 0’ vs CAR 120’ P = 0.0299; CTRL KD CAR 120’ vs SDC4 KD #1 CAR 120’ P = 0.0499; CTRL KD CAR 120’ vs SDC4 KD #2 CAR 120’ P = 0.0132. Holm-Sidak t test: CTRL KD Nil 0’ vs CTRL KD CAR 10’ P = 0.0012. Source data are provided in file. e Flow cytometric analysis of cell surface SDC4 in HaCaTs following SDC4 knockdown.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Systemically administered wound-homing peptide accelerates wound healing by modulating syndecan-4 function

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43848-1

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a , b ARF6 activity (ARF6 GTP) assessed by effector pull-down in HaCaT keratinocytes in the presence or absence of 10 µg/ml CAR or m CAR peptide. a Representative blots of ARF6 activity during time-course. ARF6 GTP: ARF6 detection in GST-GGA3 pull-down eluate. Total ARF6: ARF6 expression in total cell lysate. Tubulin: total cell lysate loading control. b Mean ARF6 activity, relative to total ARF6 ± S.E.M. normalised to 0 min Nil treatment. N = 3–7 independent biological replicate experiments (Nil: 0 min N = 7, 60 min N = 3; CAR: 10–60 min N = 3, 120 min N = 7; m CAR: 30–60 min N = 3, 120 min N = 6). Datapoints represent ARF6 activity per experiment. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test: Nil 0’ vs CAR 120’ P = 6.457 × 10 −5 ; CAR 120’ vs m CAR 120’ P = 6.732 × 10 −6 ; Nil 60’ vs CAR 60’ P = 4.865 × 10 −5 ; CAR 60’ vs m CAR 60’ P = 0.0063. Holm-Sidak t test: Nil 0’ vs CAR 10’ P = 0.0004. c – e ARF6 activity in HaCaT cells transfected with control siRNA (CTRL KD), human SDC4-targeting siRNA oligo #1 (SDC4 KD #1) or human SDC4-targeting siRNA oligo #2 (SDC4 KD #2), in the presence or absence of 10 µg/ml CAR or m CAR peptide. c Representative blots of ARF6 activity during time-course. ARF6 GTP: ARF6 detection in GST-GGA3 pull-down eluate; total ARF6: ARF6 expression in total cell lysate. d Mean ARF6 activity, relative to total ARF6 ± S.E.M. normalised to Nil treatment. N = 3–5 independent replicate experiments (Ctrl KD: Nil 0 min N = 5; CAR 10 min N = 4, 30–120 min N = 5; mCAR 120 min N = 3. SDC4 KD #1: Nil 0 min N = 3; CAR 10–120 min N = 3; m CAR 120 min N = 3. SDC4 KD #5: Nil 0 min N = 5; CAR 10–120 min N = 5; m CAR 120 min N = 3). Datapoints represent ARF6 activity per experiment. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test: CTRL KD Nil 0’ vs CAR 120’ P = 0.0299; CTRL KD CAR 120’ vs SDC4 KD #1 CAR 120’ P = 0.0499; CTRL KD CAR 120’ vs SDC4 KD #2 CAR 120’ P = 0.0132. Holm-Sidak t test: CTRL KD Nil 0’ vs CTRL KD CAR 10’ P = 0.0012. Source data are provided in file. e Flow cytometric analysis of cell surface SDC4 in HaCaTs following SDC4 knockdown.

    Article Snippet: Following permeabilisation with 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100 for 10 min and blockade with 2% BSA in PBS - for 1 h, cells were incubated with either 5 μg/ml rabbit anti-ARF6 pAb (#PA1-093, Invitrogen) and 5 μg/ml mouse anti-CYTH2 mAb (10A12; #MA1-061, Pierce), or 10 μg/ml mouse anti-ARF6 mAb (3A-1; #sc-7971, Santa Cruz) and 5 μg/ml rabbit anti-IQSEC1 pAb (#PA5-38019, Invitrogen), in PBS - containing 0.5% (w/v) BSA and 0.05% TritonX-100 for 1 h. Primary antibodies were detected using 1:400 AlexaFluor-488 and −647-conjugated species-specific secondary antibodies and actin was detected using AlexaFluor-594-conjugated phalloidin (1:400; A12381, Invitrogen).

    Techniques: Activity Assay, Expressing, Control, Transfection, Knockdown

    Migration of HaCaT keratinocytes on fibronectin in scratch wound assays, in the presence or absence of 10 µg/ml CAR or m CAR peptide. Cells were analysed over 17 h ( a – d ) or 20 h ( e – h ) by time-lapse microscopy. a – d HaCaT cells transfected with control siRNA (CTRL KD), human SDC4-targeting siRNA oligo #1 (SDC4 KD #1) or human SDC4-targeting siRNA oligo #2 (SDC4 KD #2). a Scratch wound closure, ( b ) speed at early phase of migration (Timepoint 0–5 h), ( c ) speed at late phase of migration (Late: Timepoint 12–17 h), and ( d ) representative migration tracks during late phase migration. See also Supplementary Movie and and Supplementary Fig. . Data are representative from one of four independent experiments. Values are means ± S.E.M. All statistical analyses are two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. a n = 5–6 fields of view per condition (Ctrl KD: Nil & CAR n = 6; m CAR n = 5. SDC4 KD #1 & #2: Nil, CAR & m CAR n = 5); CTRL KD Nil vs CAR P = 1.383 × 10 −7 ; CTRL KD CAR vs m CAR P = 2.239 × 10 −6 ; CTRL KD CAR vs SDC4 KD #1 CAR P = 4.341 × 10 −6 ; CTRL KD CAR vs SDC4 KD #2 CAR P = 2.630 × 10 −5 . b , c n = 40–60 cells per condition. b Early phase: CTRL KD Nil vs CAR P = 9.808 × 10 −6 ; CTRL KD CAR vs m CAR P = 1.639 × 10 −9 . (c) Late phase: CTRL KD Nil vs CAR P = 2.520 × 10 −11 ; CTRL KD CAR vs m CAR P = 2.520 × 10 −11 . e – h HaCaT cells transfected with control siRNA (CTRL KD) or human ARF6-targeting siRNA. e Scratch wound closure, ( f ) speed at early phase of migration (Timepoint 0–5 h), ( g ) speed at late phase of migration (Late: Timepoint 15–20 h), and ( e ) representative migration tracks during late phase migration. See also Supplementary Movie and and Supplementary Fig. . Data are representative from one of four independent experiments. Values are means ± S.D. All statistical analyses are two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. e n = 4–6 fields of view per condition (Ctrl KD: Nil n = 4, CAR n = 3; m CAR n = 5. ARF6 KD: Nil, CAR & m CAR n = 6); CTRL KD Nil vs CAR P = 6.312 × 10 −6 ; CTRL KD CAR vs m CAR P = 7.806 × 10 −5 ; CTRL KD CAR vs ARF6 KD CAR P = 1.636 × 10 −6 . f , g n = 49–60 cells per condition (Ctrl KD: Nil & CAR n = 60, m CAR n = 59. ARF6 KD: Nil n = 58, CAR & m CAR n = 49). f Early phase: CTRL KD Nil vs CAR P = 6.82 × 10 −13 ; CTRL KD CAR vs m CAR P = 0.0006; CTRL KD CAR vs ARF6 KD CAR P = 8.897 × 10 −6 ( g ) Late phase: CTRL KD Nil vs CAR P = 4.68 × 10 −13 ; CTRL KD CAR vs m CAR P = 4.68 × 10 −13 ; CTRL KD CAR vs ARF6 KD CAR P = 4.68 × 10 −13 ( a , e ) Each data point represents a single field of view; ( b , c , e , f ) Each data point represents an individual cell. Source data are provided as a file.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Systemically administered wound-homing peptide accelerates wound healing by modulating syndecan-4 function

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43848-1

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Migration of HaCaT keratinocytes on fibronectin in scratch wound assays, in the presence or absence of 10 µg/ml CAR or m CAR peptide. Cells were analysed over 17 h ( a – d ) or 20 h ( e – h ) by time-lapse microscopy. a – d HaCaT cells transfected with control siRNA (CTRL KD), human SDC4-targeting siRNA oligo #1 (SDC4 KD #1) or human SDC4-targeting siRNA oligo #2 (SDC4 KD #2). a Scratch wound closure, ( b ) speed at early phase of migration (Timepoint 0–5 h), ( c ) speed at late phase of migration (Late: Timepoint 12–17 h), and ( d ) representative migration tracks during late phase migration. See also Supplementary Movie and and Supplementary Fig. . Data are representative from one of four independent experiments. Values are means ± S.E.M. All statistical analyses are two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. a n = 5–6 fields of view per condition (Ctrl KD: Nil & CAR n = 6; m CAR n = 5. SDC4 KD #1 & #2: Nil, CAR & m CAR n = 5); CTRL KD Nil vs CAR P = 1.383 × 10 −7 ; CTRL KD CAR vs m CAR P = 2.239 × 10 −6 ; CTRL KD CAR vs SDC4 KD #1 CAR P = 4.341 × 10 −6 ; CTRL KD CAR vs SDC4 KD #2 CAR P = 2.630 × 10 −5 . b , c n = 40–60 cells per condition. b Early phase: CTRL KD Nil vs CAR P = 9.808 × 10 −6 ; CTRL KD CAR vs m CAR P = 1.639 × 10 −9 . (c) Late phase: CTRL KD Nil vs CAR P = 2.520 × 10 −11 ; CTRL KD CAR vs m CAR P = 2.520 × 10 −11 . e – h HaCaT cells transfected with control siRNA (CTRL KD) or human ARF6-targeting siRNA. e Scratch wound closure, ( f ) speed at early phase of migration (Timepoint 0–5 h), ( g ) speed at late phase of migration (Late: Timepoint 15–20 h), and ( e ) representative migration tracks during late phase migration. See also Supplementary Movie and and Supplementary Fig. . Data are representative from one of four independent experiments. Values are means ± S.D. All statistical analyses are two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. e n = 4–6 fields of view per condition (Ctrl KD: Nil n = 4, CAR n = 3; m CAR n = 5. ARF6 KD: Nil, CAR & m CAR n = 6); CTRL KD Nil vs CAR P = 6.312 × 10 −6 ; CTRL KD CAR vs m CAR P = 7.806 × 10 −5 ; CTRL KD CAR vs ARF6 KD CAR P = 1.636 × 10 −6 . f , g n = 49–60 cells per condition (Ctrl KD: Nil & CAR n = 60, m CAR n = 59. ARF6 KD: Nil n = 58, CAR & m CAR n = 49). f Early phase: CTRL KD Nil vs CAR P = 6.82 × 10 −13 ; CTRL KD CAR vs m CAR P = 0.0006; CTRL KD CAR vs ARF6 KD CAR P = 8.897 × 10 −6 ( g ) Late phase: CTRL KD Nil vs CAR P = 4.68 × 10 −13 ; CTRL KD CAR vs m CAR P = 4.68 × 10 −13 ; CTRL KD CAR vs ARF6 KD CAR P = 4.68 × 10 −13 ( a , e ) Each data point represents a single field of view; ( b , c , e , f ) Each data point represents an individual cell. Source data are provided as a file.

    Article Snippet: Following permeabilisation with 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100 for 10 min and blockade with 2% BSA in PBS - for 1 h, cells were incubated with either 5 μg/ml rabbit anti-ARF6 pAb (#PA1-093, Invitrogen) and 5 μg/ml mouse anti-CYTH2 mAb (10A12; #MA1-061, Pierce), or 10 μg/ml mouse anti-ARF6 mAb (3A-1; #sc-7971, Santa Cruz) and 5 μg/ml rabbit anti-IQSEC1 pAb (#PA5-38019, Invitrogen), in PBS - containing 0.5% (w/v) BSA and 0.05% TritonX-100 for 1 h. Primary antibodies were detected using 1:400 AlexaFluor-488 and −647-conjugated species-specific secondary antibodies and actin was detected using AlexaFluor-594-conjugated phalloidin (1:400; A12381, Invitrogen).

    Techniques: Migration, Time-lapse Microscopy, Transfection, Control

    a , b Proteomic analysis of ARF regulatory molecules co-immunoprecipitating with human SDC4 (huSDC4) from Syn4WT, Syn4-/-, Syn4Y180E and Syn4Y180L MEFs. a Protein-protein interaction network of molecules in the GO Term “Regulation of ARF Protein Signal Transduction” [GO:0032012]. GEFs: green nodes; GAPs: purple nodes; Blue nodes: proteins not in GO:0032012 (ARF6, ARF1 GTPases and SDC4 bait protein); Edges (grey lines): known protein-protein interactions; Black labels: proteins with reported ARF6 activity modulation properties ; white labels: proteins not reported to modulate ARF6 activity . Red dashed box: proteins co-immunoprecipitating with huSDC4. b Heatmap displaying proteins within GO:0032012 co-immunoprecipitating with huSDC4. Colour-coding indicates enrichment levels (weighted spectral counts). c , d Quantitative analysis of CYTH2/ARF6 co-localisation following CAR peptide stimulation. c Subcellular distribution of CYTH2 (magenta) and ARF6 (green) following 60-min treatment 10 µg/ml CAR, m CAR or vehicle control. Dashed boxes: inset regions. Scale bars: 5 μm (main images); 2 μm (insets). d Pearson’s coefficient of CYTH2 and ARF6 co-localisation ± S.E.M. following 0–120-min treatment with 10 µg/ml CAR or vehicle control. Datapoints represent mean Pearson’s coefficient of CYTH2 and ARF6 co-localisation per image. N = 3 independent replicate experiments with 17–22 images analysed per condition. Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test: Nil 0’ vs CAR 60’ P = 7.385 × 10 −5 ; Nil 60’ vs CAR 60’ P = 0.0019; CAR 60’ vs m CAR 60’ P = 3.828 × 10 −6 . e CAR peptide promotes association of CYTH2 with ARF6. Immunoprecipitation of ARF6 following 0, 30 or 60 min CAR or m CAR treatment. immunoprecipitation with rabbit anti-ARF6 (IP: ARF6); or non-immune rabbit IgG (IP: IgG). Immune complex-associated CYTH2 and ARF6 detected by western blot. f , g ARF6 activity in CTRL KD or CYTH2 KD keratinocytes following 120 min in presence or absence of CAR or m CAR. N = 4 Independent biological replicate experiments. f Representative blots of ARF6 GTP (GST-GGA3 pull-down eluate); Total ARF6: ARF6 expression in total cell lysate. Actin detection in TCL acts as a loading control. CYTH2 detection in TCL demonstrates level of siRNA-mediated knockdown. g Mean ARF6 activity relative to total ARF6 ± S.E.M. normalised to Nil treatment in Ctrl KD cells. N = 4 independent replicate experiments. Datapoints represent ARF6 activity in each experiment. Brown–Forsythe and Welch ANOVA test for multiple comparisons assuming non-equal variance: CTRL KD Nil vs CAR P = 0.0027; CTRL KD CAR vs m CAR P = 0.0213. h – k Migration of control (CTRL KD) or human CYTH2 knockdown (CYTH2 KD) HaCaTs in presence or absence 10 µg/ml CAR or m CAR peptide. h Scratch wound closure relative to untreated Ctrl KD cells, ( i ) mean migration speed throughout timelapse, j speed at early migration phase (0–5 h), k speed at late migration phase (12–17 h). Migration data are means ± S.E.M from three independent experiments in triplicate. Statistical analyses are two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test: h Scratch wound closure: CTRL KD Nil vs CAR P = 3.331 × 10 −5 ; CTRL KD CAR vs m CAR P = 0.0005; i Total migration speed: CTRL KD Nil vs CAR P = 0.017; CTRL KD CAR vs m CAR ns; k Late phase: CTRL KD Nil vs CAR P = 0.0039; CTRL KD CAR vs m CAR P = 0.0317. Source data are provided as a file.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Systemically administered wound-homing peptide accelerates wound healing by modulating syndecan-4 function

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43848-1

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a , b Proteomic analysis of ARF regulatory molecules co-immunoprecipitating with human SDC4 (huSDC4) from Syn4WT, Syn4-/-, Syn4Y180E and Syn4Y180L MEFs. a Protein-protein interaction network of molecules in the GO Term “Regulation of ARF Protein Signal Transduction” [GO:0032012]. GEFs: green nodes; GAPs: purple nodes; Blue nodes: proteins not in GO:0032012 (ARF6, ARF1 GTPases and SDC4 bait protein); Edges (grey lines): known protein-protein interactions; Black labels: proteins with reported ARF6 activity modulation properties ; white labels: proteins not reported to modulate ARF6 activity . Red dashed box: proteins co-immunoprecipitating with huSDC4. b Heatmap displaying proteins within GO:0032012 co-immunoprecipitating with huSDC4. Colour-coding indicates enrichment levels (weighted spectral counts). c , d Quantitative analysis of CYTH2/ARF6 co-localisation following CAR peptide stimulation. c Subcellular distribution of CYTH2 (magenta) and ARF6 (green) following 60-min treatment 10 µg/ml CAR, m CAR or vehicle control. Dashed boxes: inset regions. Scale bars: 5 μm (main images); 2 μm (insets). d Pearson’s coefficient of CYTH2 and ARF6 co-localisation ± S.E.M. following 0–120-min treatment with 10 µg/ml CAR or vehicle control. Datapoints represent mean Pearson’s coefficient of CYTH2 and ARF6 co-localisation per image. N = 3 independent replicate experiments with 17–22 images analysed per condition. Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test: Nil 0’ vs CAR 60’ P = 7.385 × 10 −5 ; Nil 60’ vs CAR 60’ P = 0.0019; CAR 60’ vs m CAR 60’ P = 3.828 × 10 −6 . e CAR peptide promotes association of CYTH2 with ARF6. Immunoprecipitation of ARF6 following 0, 30 or 60 min CAR or m CAR treatment. immunoprecipitation with rabbit anti-ARF6 (IP: ARF6); or non-immune rabbit IgG (IP: IgG). Immune complex-associated CYTH2 and ARF6 detected by western blot. f , g ARF6 activity in CTRL KD or CYTH2 KD keratinocytes following 120 min in presence or absence of CAR or m CAR. N = 4 Independent biological replicate experiments. f Representative blots of ARF6 GTP (GST-GGA3 pull-down eluate); Total ARF6: ARF6 expression in total cell lysate. Actin detection in TCL acts as a loading control. CYTH2 detection in TCL demonstrates level of siRNA-mediated knockdown. g Mean ARF6 activity relative to total ARF6 ± S.E.M. normalised to Nil treatment in Ctrl KD cells. N = 4 independent replicate experiments. Datapoints represent ARF6 activity in each experiment. Brown–Forsythe and Welch ANOVA test for multiple comparisons assuming non-equal variance: CTRL KD Nil vs CAR P = 0.0027; CTRL KD CAR vs m CAR P = 0.0213. h – k Migration of control (CTRL KD) or human CYTH2 knockdown (CYTH2 KD) HaCaTs in presence or absence 10 µg/ml CAR or m CAR peptide. h Scratch wound closure relative to untreated Ctrl KD cells, ( i ) mean migration speed throughout timelapse, j speed at early migration phase (0–5 h), k speed at late migration phase (12–17 h). Migration data are means ± S.E.M from three independent experiments in triplicate. Statistical analyses are two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test: h Scratch wound closure: CTRL KD Nil vs CAR P = 3.331 × 10 −5 ; CTRL KD CAR vs m CAR P = 0.0005; i Total migration speed: CTRL KD Nil vs CAR P = 0.017; CTRL KD CAR vs m CAR ns; k Late phase: CTRL KD Nil vs CAR P = 0.0039; CTRL KD CAR vs m CAR P = 0.0317. Source data are provided as a file.

    Article Snippet: Following permeabilisation with 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100 for 10 min and blockade with 2% BSA in PBS - for 1 h, cells were incubated with either 5 μg/ml rabbit anti-ARF6 pAb (#PA1-093, Invitrogen) and 5 μg/ml mouse anti-CYTH2 mAb (10A12; #MA1-061, Pierce), or 10 μg/ml mouse anti-ARF6 mAb (3A-1; #sc-7971, Santa Cruz) and 5 μg/ml rabbit anti-IQSEC1 pAb (#PA5-38019, Invitrogen), in PBS - containing 0.5% (w/v) BSA and 0.05% TritonX-100 for 1 h. Primary antibodies were detected using 1:400 AlexaFluor-488 and −647-conjugated species-specific secondary antibodies and actin was detected using AlexaFluor-594-conjugated phalloidin (1:400; A12381, Invitrogen).

    Techniques: Transduction, Protein-Protein interactions, Activity Assay, Control, Immunoprecipitation, Western Blot, Expressing, Knockdown, Migration

    Schematic diagram highlighting proposed mechanism of action of CAR peptide. Systemically administered CAR peptide associates with the HSPG SDC4, which is restricted to epidermis and blood vessels in mouse skin wounds. CAR induces SDC4-dependent activation of the small GTPase ARF6, via the guanine nucleotide exchange factor CYTH2, to promote SDC4-, ARF6- and CYTH2-mediated keratinocyte migration and endogenous re-epithelialisation and wound repair mechanisms.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Systemically administered wound-homing peptide accelerates wound healing by modulating syndecan-4 function

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43848-1

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Schematic diagram highlighting proposed mechanism of action of CAR peptide. Systemically administered CAR peptide associates with the HSPG SDC4, which is restricted to epidermis and blood vessels in mouse skin wounds. CAR induces SDC4-dependent activation of the small GTPase ARF6, via the guanine nucleotide exchange factor CYTH2, to promote SDC4-, ARF6- and CYTH2-mediated keratinocyte migration and endogenous re-epithelialisation and wound repair mechanisms.

    Article Snippet: Following permeabilisation with 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100 for 10 min and blockade with 2% BSA in PBS - for 1 h, cells were incubated with either 5 μg/ml rabbit anti-ARF6 pAb (#PA1-093, Invitrogen) and 5 μg/ml mouse anti-CYTH2 mAb (10A12; #MA1-061, Pierce), or 10 μg/ml mouse anti-ARF6 mAb (3A-1; #sc-7971, Santa Cruz) and 5 μg/ml rabbit anti-IQSEC1 pAb (#PA5-38019, Invitrogen), in PBS - containing 0.5% (w/v) BSA and 0.05% TritonX-100 for 1 h. Primary antibodies were detected using 1:400 AlexaFluor-488 and −647-conjugated species-specific secondary antibodies and actin was detected using AlexaFluor-594-conjugated phalloidin (1:400; A12381, Invitrogen).

    Techniques: Activation Assay, Migration

    ( A ) Schematic illustrating effect of ARF6 mutations on GTP hydrolysis and GDP exchange. ( B ) Expression of endogenous and HA-tagged mutant ARF6 (WT, CA, DN and FC) was studied by western blotting in HPAECs 24 hour post-infection. ( C ) Representative western blots and ( D ) a corresponding graph showing changes in the levels of active (GTP-bound) ARF6, total ARF6 and β-actin, as indicated. ( D ) shows fold-changes normalised to the empty adenoviral control (AdC) (n=3 different biological replicates), ***P<0.001; one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: ARF6 as a novel activator of HIF-2α in pulmonary arterial hypertension

    doi: 10.1101/2023.09.15.557917

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Schematic illustrating effect of ARF6 mutations on GTP hydrolysis and GDP exchange. ( B ) Expression of endogenous and HA-tagged mutant ARF6 (WT, CA, DN and FC) was studied by western blotting in HPAECs 24 hour post-infection. ( C ) Representative western blots and ( D ) a corresponding graph showing changes in the levels of active (GTP-bound) ARF6, total ARF6 and β-actin, as indicated. ( D ) shows fold-changes normalised to the empty adenoviral control (AdC) (n=3 different biological replicates), ***P<0.001; one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test.

    Article Snippet: Fixed and permeabilized HPAECs were then incubated with mouse monoclonal anti-human ARF6 antibody (Santa Cruz; # sc7971, 1:100) or VE-Cadherin-AlexaFluor 488 (eBioscience; 16B1, # 53-1449-42; 1:100) and then FITC-Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Inc., # 115-095-003; 1:200).

    Techniques: Expressing, Mutagenesis, Western Blot, Infection, Control

    ( A ) Proteomics workflow for HPAEC whole cell lysates using tandem mass tag (TMT) labelling followed by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. ( B ) Western blots and ( C ) quantification of total ARF6 overexpression in HPAECs from four different donors (n=4). ( D ) Volcano plots displaying the protein changes according to proteomic analysis for the four different ARF6 mutants; black symbols indicate differentially expressed proteins with ARF6 highlighted in red. ( E ) Stacked bar chart showing the number of upregulated pathways induced by each ARF6 mutant, according to each bioinformatics database. ( F ) Bubble plot of the 10 most significantly upregulated Panther pathways by overexpression of CA-ARF6. ( G ) Enrichment map summarising all upregulated pathway changes induced by CA-ARF6, with ‘HIF Signalling’ highlighted in red.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: ARF6 as a novel activator of HIF-2α in pulmonary arterial hypertension

    doi: 10.1101/2023.09.15.557917

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Proteomics workflow for HPAEC whole cell lysates using tandem mass tag (TMT) labelling followed by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. ( B ) Western blots and ( C ) quantification of total ARF6 overexpression in HPAECs from four different donors (n=4). ( D ) Volcano plots displaying the protein changes according to proteomic analysis for the four different ARF6 mutants; black symbols indicate differentially expressed proteins with ARF6 highlighted in red. ( E ) Stacked bar chart showing the number of upregulated pathways induced by each ARF6 mutant, according to each bioinformatics database. ( F ) Bubble plot of the 10 most significantly upregulated Panther pathways by overexpression of CA-ARF6. ( G ) Enrichment map summarising all upregulated pathway changes induced by CA-ARF6, with ‘HIF Signalling’ highlighted in red.

    Article Snippet: Fixed and permeabilized HPAECs were then incubated with mouse monoclonal anti-human ARF6 antibody (Santa Cruz; # sc7971, 1:100) or VE-Cadherin-AlexaFluor 488 (eBioscience; 16B1, # 53-1449-42; 1:100) and then FITC-Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Inc., # 115-095-003; 1:200).

    Techniques: Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, Western Blot, Over Expression, Mutagenesis

    ( A ) Quantification of HIF-2α in nuclear fractions of HPAECs overexpressing ARF6 mutants, as indicated; western blotting; n=3. ( B ) Representative western blots showing cytoplasmic and nuclear localization of HIF-1α and HIF-2α. ( C ) Cellular distribution of HIF-2α (red) merged with nuclear stain (DAPI, blue), immunofluorescence; Bar = 20μm. ( D ) HIF activity measured in luciferase reporter assay in U2OS-HRE-Luc cells (RLU = relative luminescence units; n=3 independent experiments). (E) Expression of selected HIF target genes by RT-qPCR (n=3).

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: ARF6 as a novel activator of HIF-2α in pulmonary arterial hypertension

    doi: 10.1101/2023.09.15.557917

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Quantification of HIF-2α in nuclear fractions of HPAECs overexpressing ARF6 mutants, as indicated; western blotting; n=3. ( B ) Representative western blots showing cytoplasmic and nuclear localization of HIF-1α and HIF-2α. ( C ) Cellular distribution of HIF-2α (red) merged with nuclear stain (DAPI, blue), immunofluorescence; Bar = 20μm. ( D ) HIF activity measured in luciferase reporter assay in U2OS-HRE-Luc cells (RLU = relative luminescence units; n=3 independent experiments). (E) Expression of selected HIF target genes by RT-qPCR (n=3).

    Article Snippet: Fixed and permeabilized HPAECs were then incubated with mouse monoclonal anti-human ARF6 antibody (Santa Cruz; # sc7971, 1:100) or VE-Cadherin-AlexaFluor 488 (eBioscience; 16B1, # 53-1449-42; 1:100) and then FITC-Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Inc., # 115-095-003; 1:200).

    Techniques: Western Blot, Staining, Immunofluorescence, Activity Assay, Luciferase, Reporter Assay, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR

    ( A ) Volcano plot of selected junctional proteins from proteomic analysis of CA-ARF6. ( B ) Bubble plot showing enrichment of pathways referencing ‘Junctions’ from different bioinformatics databases by CA-ARF6. ( C ) Bar chart of selected proliferation marker proteins from proteomic analysis of CA-ARF6. ( D ) Bubble plot showing enrichment of pathways referencing ‘Proliferation’ from different bioinformatics databases by CA-ARF6. (E) FITC-dextran permeability assay (n=4). (F) CyQUANT cell proliferation assay (n=3-4). In ( E ) *P<0.05, comparison with AdC; In ( F ) *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, comparisons, as indicated; one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-test.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: ARF6 as a novel activator of HIF-2α in pulmonary arterial hypertension

    doi: 10.1101/2023.09.15.557917

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Volcano plot of selected junctional proteins from proteomic analysis of CA-ARF6. ( B ) Bubble plot showing enrichment of pathways referencing ‘Junctions’ from different bioinformatics databases by CA-ARF6. ( C ) Bar chart of selected proliferation marker proteins from proteomic analysis of CA-ARF6. ( D ) Bubble plot showing enrichment of pathways referencing ‘Proliferation’ from different bioinformatics databases by CA-ARF6. (E) FITC-dextran permeability assay (n=4). (F) CyQUANT cell proliferation assay (n=3-4). In ( E ) *P<0.05, comparison with AdC; In ( F ) *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, comparisons, as indicated; one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-test.

    Article Snippet: Fixed and permeabilized HPAECs were then incubated with mouse monoclonal anti-human ARF6 antibody (Santa Cruz; # sc7971, 1:100) or VE-Cadherin-AlexaFluor 488 (eBioscience; 16B1, # 53-1449-42; 1:100) and then FITC-Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Inc., # 115-095-003; 1:200).

    Techniques: Marker, FITC-Dextran Permeability Assay, CyQUANT Assay, Proliferation Assay, Comparison

    ( A ) Representative Western blots and ( B ) quantification of active ARF6-GTP and HIF-2α during hypoxia (1% O 2 ) time course (n=4). ( C ) Representative western blots showing ARF6-GTP, total ARF6, HIF-1α and HIF-2α following treatment with increasing concentrations of chlortetracycline (CTC) in hypoxia (Hx, 24h), compared with normoxic control (Nx). ( D ) Expression of selected HIF target genes; qPCR, fold change of control; n=3-4. ( E ) CyQUANT cell proliferation assay; n=4; log2 fold change of control. ( F, G ) graph and corresponding representative images of endothelial tube formation in vitro. HPAECs were cultured in serum- and growth factors-reduced medium (0.5% FBS) and were treated, as indicated. n=5-6. *P<0.05; **P<0.01, comparisons, as indicated; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. In (G) Bar=100μm

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: ARF6 as a novel activator of HIF-2α in pulmonary arterial hypertension

    doi: 10.1101/2023.09.15.557917

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Representative Western blots and ( B ) quantification of active ARF6-GTP and HIF-2α during hypoxia (1% O 2 ) time course (n=4). ( C ) Representative western blots showing ARF6-GTP, total ARF6, HIF-1α and HIF-2α following treatment with increasing concentrations of chlortetracycline (CTC) in hypoxia (Hx, 24h), compared with normoxic control (Nx). ( D ) Expression of selected HIF target genes; qPCR, fold change of control; n=3-4. ( E ) CyQUANT cell proliferation assay; n=4; log2 fold change of control. ( F, G ) graph and corresponding representative images of endothelial tube formation in vitro. HPAECs were cultured in serum- and growth factors-reduced medium (0.5% FBS) and were treated, as indicated. n=5-6. *P<0.05; **P<0.01, comparisons, as indicated; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. In (G) Bar=100μm

    Article Snippet: Fixed and permeabilized HPAECs were then incubated with mouse monoclonal anti-human ARF6 antibody (Santa Cruz; # sc7971, 1:100) or VE-Cadherin-AlexaFluor 488 (eBioscience; 16B1, # 53-1449-42; 1:100) and then FITC-Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Inc., # 115-095-003; 1:200).

    Techniques: Western Blot, Control, Expressing, CyQUANT Assay, Proliferation Assay, In Vitro, Cell Culture

    ( A ) Experimental outline: CTC (ip, 77.3mg/kg) or vehicle (ip, H 2 O) were administered to control mice or mice kept in a normobaric hypoxic chamber (10% O 2 ) for 24 hours, as indicated. Lung, heart, kidney and liver tissues were collected from all animals. ( B, C ) Representative western blots and quantification of active ARF6 and ( D, E ) western blots and quantification of HIF-2α in mouse lung tissue lysates (n=3-4). ( F ) Pearson correlation between fold-changes in ARF6-GTP and HIF-2α based on western blotting analysis. ( G ) Expression of selected HIF target genes by RT-qPCR (n=4-5). *P<0.05; **P<0.01, comparisons, as indicated. one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-test.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: ARF6 as a novel activator of HIF-2α in pulmonary arterial hypertension

    doi: 10.1101/2023.09.15.557917

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Experimental outline: CTC (ip, 77.3mg/kg) or vehicle (ip, H 2 O) were administered to control mice or mice kept in a normobaric hypoxic chamber (10% O 2 ) for 24 hours, as indicated. Lung, heart, kidney and liver tissues were collected from all animals. ( B, C ) Representative western blots and quantification of active ARF6 and ( D, E ) western blots and quantification of HIF-2α in mouse lung tissue lysates (n=3-4). ( F ) Pearson correlation between fold-changes in ARF6-GTP and HIF-2α based on western blotting analysis. ( G ) Expression of selected HIF target genes by RT-qPCR (n=4-5). *P<0.05; **P<0.01, comparisons, as indicated. one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-test.

    Article Snippet: Fixed and permeabilized HPAECs were then incubated with mouse monoclonal anti-human ARF6 antibody (Santa Cruz; # sc7971, 1:100) or VE-Cadherin-AlexaFluor 488 (eBioscience; 16B1, # 53-1449-42; 1:100) and then FITC-Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Inc., # 115-095-003; 1:200).

    Techniques: Control, Western Blot, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR

    ( A ) Schematic outline of comparative analysis between CA-ARF6 and other PAH databases. ( B ) Bubble plot of all shared upregulated and downregulated pathways in CA-ARF6 and PAH datasets. ( C ) Venn diagram showing number of pathways affected by CA-ARF6 and PAH. Statistical differences in proportions were analysed by Fisher’s Exact Test. ( D, E ) Graphs showing quantification of ARF6-GTP and HIF-2α in healthy and (F, G ) PAH endothelial colony forming cells (ECFCs).( H ) Representative western blots corresponding to (D, E) and (I) western blots corresponding to (F, G). In (D-G) **P<0.01, **P<0.001, one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-test, n=3.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: ARF6 as a novel activator of HIF-2α in pulmonary arterial hypertension

    doi: 10.1101/2023.09.15.557917

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Schematic outline of comparative analysis between CA-ARF6 and other PAH databases. ( B ) Bubble plot of all shared upregulated and downregulated pathways in CA-ARF6 and PAH datasets. ( C ) Venn diagram showing number of pathways affected by CA-ARF6 and PAH. Statistical differences in proportions were analysed by Fisher’s Exact Test. ( D, E ) Graphs showing quantification of ARF6-GTP and HIF-2α in healthy and (F, G ) PAH endothelial colony forming cells (ECFCs).( H ) Representative western blots corresponding to (D, E) and (I) western blots corresponding to (F, G). In (D-G) **P<0.01, **P<0.001, one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-test, n=3.

    Article Snippet: Fixed and permeabilized HPAECs were then incubated with mouse monoclonal anti-human ARF6 antibody (Santa Cruz; # sc7971, 1:100) or VE-Cadherin-AlexaFluor 488 (eBioscience; 16B1, # 53-1449-42; 1:100) and then FITC-Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Inc., # 115-095-003; 1:200).

    Techniques: Western Blot